ReviewSentinel node biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: A diagnostic meta-analysis
Introduction
Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC and OPSCC) are considered an important part of the global burden of cancer, mainly due to the widespread use of tobacco and alcohol.1 The most important prognostic factor is the presence of cervical lymph node metastases, which can decrease the 5-year survival rates to lower than 50%.2 Exact staging of the neck is therefore crucial in managing this type of cancer.
Staging by palpation and imaging techniques (e.g. MRI, CT, ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USgFNAC) are not sensitive enough in detecting micrometastases, resulting in a high incidence of occult metastases in the neck.3 In the literature rates between 23% and 43% have been reported.4 Because of this, elective neck dissection (END) is the standard of care in clinically negative necks (cN0) of early stage (T1/T2) oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in most institutions. However, this implies overtreatment and treatment associated morbidity in the majority of patients.5
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as an alternative or additional staging procedure. The SLNB procedure is based on the concept that tumor cells will spread from the primary site to a single node or group of nodes (the sentinel nodes), before progressing to the remainder of the lymph nodes. A radiotracer, possibly in conjunction with colored dye injected into the primary tumor allows for identifying the sentinel nodes. Radiolocalization of the sentinel node consists of a preoperative lymphoscintigraphy either or not with SPECT/CT and the intraoperative use of a hand-held gamma probe and/or portable gamma-camera.6 Histopathological evaluation of sentinel nodes may allow accurate prediction of the disease status. False negative results can have several causes including uneven radionuclide injection, obscuring of sentinel lymph nodes by the radioactive signal of the primary tumor, and lymphatic obstruction by gross tumor, resulting in redirection of lymphatic flow.7
Although SLNB is still an invasive procedure, it gives less morbidity than selective neck dissection by sparing relevant structures.[8], [9] Therefore, SLNB can have great consequences for the treatment of OCSCC and OPSCC patients. More accurate staging of the neck by SLNB could be a serious alternative for direct elective neck dissection.
The aim of this diagnostic meta-analysis therefore was to study the diagnostic accuracy of SLNB in cT1/T2N0 oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer patients.
Section snippets
Data sources and searches
We searched electronic databases, including EMBASE and MEDLINE (Pubmed) from inception up to November 7 2012, by combining oral cavity cancer keywords with sentinel node biopsy keywords. No restrictions on language were used in the search. All citations identified by the search were imported into a EndNote bibliographic database.10
Study selection
Initially the titles and abstracts of the search results were screened. Subsequently, the reports were reviewed according to pre-defined inclusion and exclusion
Results
In total 1884 studies were identified. After removal of duplicates and screening of titles and abstracts, 116 studies were selected for a full text evaluation. 21 Studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and a data extraction form was completed for these studies (Fig. 1).[7], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]
The studies contained 847 cases in total. Most studies also mentioned the detection rate of sentinel
Discussion
The results of this diagnostic meta-analysis demonstrate that sentinel node biopsy appears to be a sensitive method in the detection of neck metastases in cT1/T2N0 OCSCC. In almost all patients at least one sentinel node was detected and therefore a biopsy could be taken which means that the procedure appears to be applicable as well.
These results are in line with a previous conducted meta-analysis which also showed a high sensitivity of SLNB in CT1/T2N0 patients.16 The major strengths of our
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Maarten de Rooij of the department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands, and Hans Reitsma of the Julius Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands for their advice and help with the analyses.
References (34)
- et al.
Reliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
(2005) - et al.
Epidemiology of cancer from the oral cavity and oropharynx
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2011) - et al.
Elective neck dissection in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma–does it influence recurrence and survival?
Head Neck
(2007) - et al.
Predictive factors for failure to identify sentinel nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Head Neck
(2008) - et al.
Improved survival with elective neck dissection in thick early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma
Head Neck
(2012) - et al.
Neck treatment and shoulder morbidity: still a challenge
Head Neck
(2011) - et al.
A portable gamma-camera for intraoperative detection of sentinel nodes in the head and neck region
J Nucl Med: Off Publ, Soc Nucl Med
(2010) - et al.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy accurately stages the regional lymph nodes for T1–T2 oral squamous cell carcinomas: results of a prospective multi-institutional trial
J Clin Oncol
(2010) - et al.
Function, postoperative morbidity, and quality of life after cervical sentinel node biopsy and after selective neck dissection
Head Neck
(2009) - et al.
Comparison of morbidity between sentinel node biopsy and elective neck dissection for treatment of the n0 neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
Head Neck
(2011)
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
Ann Intern Med
Sentinel node biopsy in head and neck squamous cell cancer: 5-year follow-up of a European multicenter trial
Ann Surg Oncol
Diagnostic efficacy of sentinel node biopsy in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cohort study and meta-analysis
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal
Cited by (134)
In Reply
2024, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryDoes Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Accurately Stage the Clinically Negative Neck in Early Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma?
2022, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Both these situations occurred in our study that reduced sentinel node detection and retrieval rates, respectively. However, previous SLNB studies have shown both a cost advantage2 and superior results concerning morbidity, quality of life, and shoulder function compared with END.18 Garrel et al19 recently presented evidence from their multi-institutional equivalence RCT comparing END and SLNB (and neck dissection only if SLNB was positive) in patients with T1/T2 oral cancer involving 155 patients in each arm.
Tumor–stroma ratio is a crucial histological predictor of occult cervical lymph node metastasis and survival in early-stage (cT1/2N0) oral squamous cell carcinoma
2022, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery