Oral Oncology
Volume 46, Issue 7 , Pages 492-496, July 2010

Refining the diagnosis of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using human papillomavirus testing

  • Max Robinson

      Affiliations

    • School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4BW, UK. Tel.: +44 191 222 8391; fax: +44 191 222 6137.
  • ,
  • Philip Sloan

      Affiliations

    • School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, UK
  • ,
  • Richard Shaw

      Affiliations

    • School of Cancer Studies, University of Liverpool, UK

Received 14 January 2010; received in revised form 16 February 2010; accepted 17 February 2010. published online 15 March 2010.

Summary 

There is accumulating evidence that oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) that harbour oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) are biologically distinct and have a better prognosis. This information is a persuasive argument for the identification of these cancers in clinical practice. The concept of ‘HPV related’ SCC should be underpinned by knowledge that the malignant cells harbour a high risk HPV genotype and there is evidence of oncogenic viral protein expression with effects on cell signalling pathways. For satisfactory classification in clinical practice HPV tests should reliably work on fixed cells and tissue. There is evidence that detection of high risk HPV by consensus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) alone is insufficient to accurately classify tumours. However, there is convincing evidence that the detection of p16 protein by immunohistochemistry can be used as a surrogate marker for the elaboration of oncogenic HPV proteins. Recently, there have been calls for standardisation of HPV testing in head and neck cancers and two diagnostic algorithms have emerged: the first advocates screening for p16 by immunohistochemistry followed by detection of HPV DNA by in situ hybridisation: the second recommends detection of p16 followed by consensus PCR. The majority of pathology laboratories have the capability of delivering the first algorithm. Furthermore, the techniques employed are automated and are subject to stringent quality assurance measures; features that can deliver routine, accurate and cost effective HPV testing for oropharyngeal cancers.

Keywords: Head and neck cancer, Oropharyngeal cancer, HPV, p16, Molecular diagnosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1368-8375(10)00060-6

doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.02.013

Oral Oncology
Volume 46, Issue 7 , Pages 492-496, July 2010