Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 485-491 (July 2010)


View previous. 2 of 16 View next.

Molecular analysis of surgical margins in head and neck cancer: More than a marginal issue

Boudewijn J.M. BraakhuisaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Elisabeth Bloemenabc, C. René Leemansa, Ruud H. Brakenhoffa

Received 13 January 2010; received in revised form 26 January 2010; accepted 27 January 2010. published online 02 March 2010.

Summary 

The relatively modest survival of patients surgically treated for advanced HNSCC can partly be explained by the development of local relapse. It is important that surgeons are able to predict which patients are at high risk to develop local relapse, since clinical management can be tailored. Local relapse after resection of a primary HNSCC is easily explained, when tumour is detected in the surgical margins and thus residual tumour is likely to remain in the patient, but the pathobiology is more complex in cases where the margins are histologically tumour-free. Molecular studies indicate that there are two different mechanisms responsible in these cases. First, small clusters of residual tumour cells that are undetectable on routine histopathological examination (known as minimal residual cancer: MRC) proliferate and this forms the basis of recurring cancer. A second cause of relapse is a remaining field of preneoplastic cells that is struck by additional genetic hits leading to invasive cancer. It is likely that within this field, that can be over 7cm in diameter, the primary carcinoma has also emerged. Despite careful histopathological examination of the surgical margins of the primary carcinoma, it is at present not reliably possible to predict which patient will develop local relapse. Herein we focus on new developments regarding the analysis of margins, causes of local relapse, and how novel molecular techniques can be of help in a more accurate risk assessment. Critical analysis of the studies that have been published thus far shows that there is a list of promising markers, based on protein expression (immuno-histochemistry) and nucleic acid analysis. Further studies should be focused on validation and assessment of the clinical utility of these markers. Margin analysis should reveal whether one is dealing with residual cancer cells that might be treated by post-operative radiotherapy or with preneoplastic fields that remained behind. For this latter entity, there is no intervention available at present, except for a more intensive surveillance.

a Department of Otolaryngology/Head–Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

b Department of Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Academic Centre of Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

c Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Tumor Biology Section, Department of Otolaryngology/Head–Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 44 40905; fax: +31 20 44 42033.

PII: S1368-8375(10)00032-1

doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.01.019


View previous. 2 of 16 View next.

Advertisement