Oral Oncology
Volume 46, Issue 4 , Pages 271-275, April 2010

Multivariate analyses to assess the effect of surgeon volume on survival rate in oral cancer: A nationwide population-based study in Taiwan

  • Ching-Chih Lee

      Affiliations

    • Community Medicine Research Center and Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Department of Otolaryngology, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
    • School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualian, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Hsu-Chueh Ho

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
    • School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualian, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Pesus Chou

      Affiliations

    • Community Medicine Research Center and Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: No.155, Sec. 2, Linong Street, Taipei 112, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 5 2648000x5231; fax: +886 5 2648006.

Received 1 December 2009; received in revised form 6 January 2010; accepted 7 January 2010. published online 08 February 2010.

Summary 

Patients with oral cancer utilize considerable health care resources, particularly when wide resection of the tumor and reconstruction with pedicle flap/free flap is performed. This study was conducted to explore the relationship between survival rates and surgeon volume. A total of 1256 patients who underwent resections for oral cancer in 2005 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Survival analysis, the Cox proportional regression model, and propensity score were used to evaluate the association between 3-year survival rates and surgeon caseloads. Oral cancer patients treated by high-volume surgeons (caseload 22–117) had better survival rates (hazard ratio [HR]=0.656; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.484–0.89; P=0.007) using the Cox proportional regression model after adjusting for patients’ comorbid conditions, hospital, and surgeon characteristics. When analyzed by propensity score, the adjusted 3-year survival rate was 74% for patients treated by high-volume surgeons compared to 58% in the low/medium-volume group (P=0.019). We concluded that for patients who underwent oral cancer resection and reconstruction, after adjusting for differences in the case mix, high-volume surgeons had better 3-year survival rates. Treatment strategies adopted by high-volume surgeons should be analyzed further and utilized more widely.

Keywords: Oral cancer, Surgeon volume, Survival rate, Cox proportional regression, Propensity score

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1368-8375(10)00010-2

doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.01.006

Oral Oncology
Volume 46, Issue 4 , Pages 271-275, April 2010