Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 52-58 (January 2009)


View previous. 12 of 18 View next.

Prediction for distant failure in patients with stage M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: The role of standardized uptake value

Sheng-Chieh Chanaf, Joseph Tung-Chieh Changbf, Hung-Ming Wangcf, Chien-Yu Linbf, Shu-Hang. Ngdf, Kang-Hsing Fanbf, Shy-Chyi Chindf, Chua-Ta Liaoef, Tzu-Chen YenafCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 15 February 2008; received in revised form 18 March 2008; accepted 19 March 2008. published online 09 June 2008.

Summary 

Distant failure is an important cause of death in stage M0 primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, a reliable prognosticator for occurrence of distant failure was lacking. Thus, we conducted this study to investigate prospectively the role of standardized uptake value on 18F-FDG for predicting distant failure in stage M0 NPC. Patients with stage M0 primary NPC diagnosed by both conventional work-up (CWU) and 18F-FDG PET were enrolled. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent prognosticators. Between January 2002 and July 2003, 65 NPC patients were investigated. Up to the date of analysis, 12 patients died and 13 patients experienced recurrences, among whom 9 had distant failures. The 5-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were 81.2%, 79.2%, 84.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the following risk factors for poor prognosis were identified: T3–4 (p=0.033) for RFS; and maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor>12.0 (p=0.012), stage IVa–b (p=0.037), and N2–3 disease (p=0.04) for DRFS. The 5-year DRFS in stage IVa–b patients with SUVmax>12.0 was significantly lower than that in stage I–III patients with SUVmax12 (p=0.0001). None of the patients in the latter group developed distant failure. In conclusion, a SUVmax>12.0 of the primary tumor represents a “metabolic phenotype” for occurrence of distant failure in stage M0 NPC patients. And the combined information of SUVmax and tumor staging can guide the use of neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy and surveillance protocols to improve distant control.

a Molecular Imaging Center and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 333 Taoyuan, Taiwan

b Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fu-Shin St, Kueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan

c Division of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fu-Shin St, Kueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan

d Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fu-Shin St, Kueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan

e Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fu-Shin St, Kueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan

f Department of Head and Neck Oncology Group, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fu-Shin St, Kueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, 5 Fu-Shin St, Kueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 3 3281 200x2673.

PII: S1368-8375(08)00097-3

doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.03.010


View previous. 12 of 18 View next.

Advertisement