Oral Oncology
Volume 40, Issue 5 , Pages 501-505, May 2004

Frey syndrome. A proposal for evaluating severity

  • Kuauhyama Luna-Ortiz

      Affiliations

    • Departamento de Cirugia de Cabeza y Cuello, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologı́a, Av. San Fernando No. 22, Tlalpan, México, D.F. 14 080, Mexico
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel./fax: +52-55-56-28-04-21
  • ,
  • Jesús Alberto Sansón-Rı́oFrı́o

      Affiliations

    • Departamento de Cirugia de Cabeza y Cuello, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologı́a, Av. San Fernando No. 22, Tlalpan, México, D.F. 14 080, Mexico
  • ,
  • Adalberto Mosqueda-Taylor

      Affiliations

    • Departamento de Atención a la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Xochimilco, México, D.F., Mexico

Received 15 September 2003; accepted 14 October 2003.

Abstract 

We aimed to establish the incidence of Frey’s syndrome in patients that have been submitted to partial and total parotidectomy at a cancer-treating hospital in Mexico City and to propose a grading system to determine its severity.

The incidence of Frey’s syndrome in 77 patients (25 male and 52 female) under oncological follow-up due to parotid tumors was subjectively evaluated through clinical findings and objectively diagnosed through Minor’s test. The positive hyperhydrotic areas were recorded and measured on transparent acetates. Numeric values were assigned according to clinical perception of symptomatology by the patients (0 for no perception and 1 for clinical recognition), extent of the affected area (1 if less than 2 cm; 2 if between 2.1 and 4 cm, and 3 if more than 4 cm), intensity and smell of sweat (3 if it was excessive or of unpleasant odor). Results were expressed as mild (if less than 4 points) or severe grades (if 4 or more points).

Frey syndrome was objectively diagnosed in 28 patients (36%), although only 17 (22%) recognized to have clinical manifestations of this condition. There were 22 women (79%) and six men (21%). Of these, seventeen (61%) had been subjected to partial and eleven (39%) to total parotidectomy. Adjuvant radiotherapy had been employed in nine cases (32%). The cutaneous affected area in the whole group ranged from 0.7 to 29.8 cm2 (mean 8.9 cm2), with a mean affected surface of 8.7±10.8 cm2 for women and 9.0±8.8 cm2 for men (p>0.05). Twelve cases were classified as mild and sixteen as severe. No significant differences were found between patients treated with partial vs. total parotidectomy or between patients treated with or without adjuvant radiotherapy.

The incidence of Frey’s syndrome in Mexican patients seems to be similar to those reported in other countries; however, the extent of hyperhydrosis is lower when compared to some European studies. Our proposal for evaluating this condition may be a helpful tool in assessing the incidence and severity among the diverse populations and it may be a useful tool to define more precisely the indications for treatment and to evaluate the available therapeutic methods according to the severity of the condition.

Keywords:  Hyperhydrosis, Frey’s syndrome, Parotidectomy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1368-8375(03)00228-8

doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2003.10.005

Oral Oncology
Volume 40, Issue 5 , Pages 501-505, May 2004